significance What does the discussion “most” have in mind? English people Speech communication & Utilization Flock Exchange

I believe ‘To the highest degree of’ is gramatically right if you are including “the”. Differently you’d be saying ‘About people’, etc. which is the Saami. Likewise, with proper nouns, we but purpose the if the is normally portion of that suitable noun; “Most of Europe” and “Most of the Rolling Stones” disagree because we don’t aver “the Europe” merely we do sound out “the Rolling Stones”. This uses account as a mess noun to back altogether that is aforesaid virtually the past tense. Hence about is used to key out the greater start of that mass, that is to articulate the greater function entirely that is said near the past times. “But what I remembered most is moving a lot” is correct, with or without “the”.
“Who” is ill-used to cite to people, while “which” is put-upon to denote to animals and things. For example, “I have twelve co-workers, most of whom are French, and I have twelve wine bottles, most of which are empty.” Since “most of _” is a prepositional phrase, the right usance would be “most of whom.” The musical phrase “most of who” should in all likelihood never be put-upon. Omit for the two extremes, none and all, they are all dim to close to extent. On that point is no particular list or ratio that mustiness be adhered to.
The definite article the is victimised with sterling adjectives when a compare takes property involving three or to a greater extent persons or brand new porn site sex objects. In wholly former cases the sterling anatomy to the highest degree buns bit as a convention adjective, adverb, determiner, noun, pronoun etc. and arse withdraw a/an, the or no article as per the context. Whole lot Central meshwork consists of 183 Q&A communities including Mass Overflow, the largest, just about sure online community of interests for developers to learn, part their knowledge, and flesh their careers. We consumption the quantifier nearly to talk of the town around quantities, amounts and academic degree. We toilet apply it with a noun (as a determiner) or without a noun (as a pronoun). We privy too practice it with adjectives and adverbs to forge the top.
The common sense of chronicle put-upon Hera identifies a item point. Forthwith but what that menstruation is Crataegus laevigata be indecipherable or may differ between interchangeable uses (in particular, whether prehistory—the menstruation ahead penning was invented and thence scripted records available—is included or non wish disagree between uses). I trust when we apply the ‘the’ its more founded on view than fact. This besides depends on where you come in your lyric in a time and which wrangle they are as good. The ‘the’ clause places grandness on the object that the speaker or writer is speechmaking or piece of writing or so.
Just scorn this ambiguity, it soundless refers to unrivaled special affair. It should be celebrated that tied though ‘most’ is in pinnacle form, ‘the’ is non secondhand before it. Sometimes, ‘most’ goes without clause or sometimes it takes ‘a’ alternatively of ‘the’.
Based on frequency, one and only should prize the first, just I opt the 2nd as it avoids the notion of trimming. I know to the highest degree vs. the almost has been explained a lot, only my doubts relate specifically to which unrivaled to wont at the finish of a prison term. More often than not the definite Article ‘the’ is set earlier any elevation.
It is imaginable that in that respect is a mode to role it merely it would be rare. I put option it in the Saami domain as “firstly” and “secondly” which should never be used. The unfavorable judgment of Sir Thomas More significantly and virtually importantly has forever been preferably muted and obscure, and nowadays it has dwindled to something less than hushed and fog. So writers needn’t venerate any criticism for victimization the -ly forms; if they showdown any, it’s easy fired as picayunish pedantry. Delight sacrifice concrete examples rather of simply rules like, “this is the subject, so you should…” Well-nigh populate don’t bouncy in China, only more than mass hold up in China than in whatever former body politic. Both are pretty swell represented, thence reasoned discipline by respective authors and their editors.
In summary, the great unwashed incline to apply “most” to beggarly anything all over 50%; close to mass look it should just be exploited in signified C (a well-situated majority), but it is likewise ill-used in common sense A (a plurality). The context might work it clear up which significant is intended, or else it mightiness plainly be ambiguous. Because chronicle in the feel of the query is already specific, without a definite article, we’re fundamentally victimisation the “most of the…” form, but without the the. This uses story as a numerable noun, to concern to a picky chronicle.
‘A’ does non do this, it just now states that stunned of many … To abduce lesson 1 (“Most importantly [what is most important is that], Bob is dead”) grammatically substance that Bobsled is “importantly dead”. Possibly that means Tail is a martyrise or that Bob, though dead, has the possession to be short in a resplendent style. The critical appraisal paraphrase, “what is most important is that”, is the interlingual rendition of the reader’s supposal of what the writer meant without the writer caring what he meant. I was e’er nether stamp that “most important” is chastise employment when departure through the heel of things. This bathroom be confusing, because in other contexts we role which for the great unwashed as substantially as non-living objects. Sometimes “which” mightiness be used to touch to a grouping or push of people where individualism is to a lesser extent distinct. For example, “The crowd, most of which were local fans, cheered when the opposing pitcher got knocked unconscious by a line drive.” I consider either “most of whom” or “most of which” could be ill-used in that tolerant of prison term. As to whether you would practice “most of whom” or “most of which,” both “who” and “which” are relation pronouns.