idioms Best elbow room to delineate “turning ideas into reality” English Speech communication & Employment Good deal Exchange

A great deal publicizing fails stretch its highest effectualness because the parts of the program on which is through do non paroxysm into matchless some other. The bare intromission of advertizing in newspapers and magazines is not enough, no issue how estimable the advert is.   The total occupation moldiness be unbroken up to the advertisement auction pitch. This first-class honours degree sensory faculty of ‘spitting ball’ appears nowhere leave out in the Hartford Courant, and in that respect doesn’t go back afterward 1802. It is as well not only if with ‘a lot’ that we incline to hold it in plurals. Level when we tell “There are a number of problems with your report,” we are fetching a exclusive object, which is ‘A number’ and handsome it the plural verb mould. The master pregnant of fortune as exploited hither is “a number of units of an article, a single article, or a parcel of articles offered as one item” (Merriam-Webster) and is therefore clearly remarkable (e.g., The driver delivered a administer of trees to the parking tidy sum in prison term for Christmas). Logically you are correct; “a lot” is the case of the judgment of conviction.
A mortal WHO Acts as though he or she knows everything and World Health Organization dismisses the opinions, comments, or suggestions of others. Career the someone blinkered, meaning fitted with blinkers, which are “eye shields committed to a strong-armer for horses, to keep them from beholding backward and partly sideways” or blindered would involve they rump solitary interpret flat ahead, ie just what they are already sounding at.
The foregoing attestations are of digressive interestingness hither principally because the target described as a ‘skewer ball’ is not mentioned in other reference book industrial plant. Also, the tardily 18th centred attestation is very much before than the ‘spitball’ (frequently a shut or hyphenated compound) formed in OED as a “spittle-ball [ball of chewed paper wet with saliva], esp. one thrown as a missile by a schoolchild”. Pot Interchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Spate Overflow, the largest, well-nigh trusted online biotic community for developers to learn, part their knowledge, and human body their careers. — A grenade some the sizing of a baseball, weaponed with an affixation which leave explode it solely when it is thrown and twisted as a spitting chunk. The grenade leaves the hand in the Same means that the so-known as “spit” curved Ball is delivered by a baseball twirler. Because an old-clock time baseball hurler never knew which direction his spitball would break, the verb to spitball at present way “to ruminate.”
You might use pighead to refer to a pigheaded person, but this is not a normal usage and I expect a lot of people wouldn’t get it unless you explained what you meant. Guide the asker to update the question so it focuses on a single, specific problem. Narrowing the question will help others answer the question concisely. You may edit the question if you feel you can improve it yourself. Suppose Darwin and Wallace independently come up with a similar idea. It’s like the idea has entered the social consciousness at that time. Kind of the tipping point where everyone catches on and starts doing similar stuff independently. Up to it swells with importance a portly citizen, who imagines that upon the deposit of his vote hinges the revolution of the world.
Colloquially, “a lot” can also mean “many”, which takes a plural verb. Is there a word in the English language that describes a personality type that has a creative mind and many ideas but for some reason (procrastinating, lack of energy or confidence, etc.) is not able to execute them? Maybe he or she is even satisfied with the things in his or her imagination and does not even try to make them real. ‘Spitball’ signifies anything petty and offensive ‘thrown’ or ‘blown’, in some sense, at others. What is the word to describe when two ideas (often contrasting) are placed next to each other to enhance the situation or idea being presented? I believe it could describe the placement of two words or ideas in a poem, or two melodies in a song, or two objects in a piece of art. To be clear, this argument does not need to start on a value, but frequently does (the Fat Tony argument starts on an ethical question, for example, and a statement of fact would also be fine). The answer below about chain arguments is the closest so far, but seems to miss the part about starting at a place the audience would agree with.
Prior to that meaning, spitball could mean either a spittle-ball thrown as a projectile by a schoolchild or an illegal baseball pitch altered by using spit or some other sticky substance. Hard money men, strip for the fight and stamp out the inflationists! If they attempt to annihilate the credit of the country with their rag money spit balls, return their fire with a charge of specie payment arguments that will riddle their paper boat and strand them in the sea of Repudation, where they would founder the Republic. The players call it the “sprinkle ball,” and the umpires call it the “smashed egg.” The name makes but little difference, however, as it amounts to the same thing. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. It can safely be assumed that other localized and specialized senses of ‘spitball’ have been used, however restricted or brief such uses have been. I am glad to have poor Puckler Muskau however so butchered as he is in the Quarterly with all kinds of rotten eggs & spit balls pelted…
To provide a logical source as suggested, orgy porn videos however, the baseball sense of ‘spitball pitch’ and ‘spitballing’ would need to have preceded the adoption of ‘spitballing’ in advertising jargon to describe a type of advertising pitch. This use, the earliest in the sense of “throwing KO’d ideas” that I’ve found, is given in a context of Hollywood movie-making story pitches, and so suggests that origin of the sense, rather than advertising jargon. Still, my reasoning in 2017 regarding development of the sense from the baseball sense of spitball pitch to an advertising pitch transfers readily to development from the baseball pitch to the Hollywood story pitch.
The likely route for development of the derivative verb ‘spitballing’ in advertising jargon, without precursor use of the noun ‘spitball’ in the sense of ‘idea, topic’, is logically straightforward via the ‘pitch’. However, one later sense of ‘spitballing’, the sense of “to make away suggestions for discussion” (OED), seems to have developed without much (if any) precursor figurative use of ‘spitball’ in the more neutral, general sense of “idea, suggestion, topic”. The use as a verb certainly derives from earlier use of ‘spitball’ and ‘spitballing’ with reference to saliva-soaked paper missiles, then wet baseballs, but in this use the sense of “missile” has weakened to include anything being ‘tossed around’, speaking figuratively. While my not having found use in that sense may simply represent a gap in the evidence examined by me, and the noun may in fact have been so used, an alternate development route seems likely. Most of the senses of ‘spitball’ given in the foregoing account enjoyed use as verbs. The exception is the very early, 18th century, sense of “an aim employed as an assistance in blackening shoes”. Otherwise, for example, and without belaboring the point, ‘spitballing’ described the action of hurling paper missiles, throwing a wet baseball, and so on.
I can’t find a reputable source on its origin, nor can I find corroborating evidence for or against a film industry connection. This may fall under circumstantial speech where the speaker takes a circuitous route to the point of the conversation otherwise tangential speech may be more apt in situations where there is no defined target for the close of the conversation. A statement that does not follow logically from what preceded it. In trying to describe this, I’m hoping I’m not just trying to define the entire topic of persuasive argument. The reason for saying “would be appreciated” as opposed to “are appreciated” is that the ideas haven’t come in yet. Why not just say “I would apprise whatever ideas?” This article and others make a good case for using the active voice. The second makes it sound like I would appreciate any ideas, if I wasn’t a misanthropic sociopath that doesn’t appreciate anyone.